Are the four priorities actually being implemented?
Not whether they sound good — whether they are happening.
Each adopted priority is an aspiration. “Creating a culture of trust” can’t be true or false, so it can’t be tracked. This instrument converts each one into markers — things you would observe if it were happening, and would not if it weren’t — and freezes a baseline at 2024. From here, everything is read as movement from baseline.
Creating a culture of trust
Crear una cultura de confianzaTrust is hardest to measure and the most consequential to get right. Money is where trust shows up first — so the strongest marker here is one the conference already instruments.
Open priority 1 →Centering discipleship
Discipulado centradoThe most fully self-measurable priority: the GCFA statistical tables carry every lagging discipleship number, annually, by church.
Open priority 2 →Cultivating relationships for belonging and voice
Cultivar relaciones para pertenecer y tener vozBelonging and voice are about who is in the room and who is heard. The denominator — who the conference is — is measurable today; the numerator — who leads — is not yet coded.
Open priority 3 →Breaking down barriers, building bridges with our neighbors
Derribar barreras y crear puentes con nuestros vecinosThe only outward-facing priority — it is about people who are not members yet. The cleanest public proxy is professions of faith, kept distinct from transfers.
Open priority 4 →Since the merger, 27 churches have closed and 84 have disaffiliated; the apportionment payout rate has fallen from 95% to 69%; and the typical church now receives 3 new believers a year.
None of that is a verdict on the priorities — most of it predates them. It is the baseline they will be measured against.